Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ksen
Re: “Polling Conspiracy”

I suspect the 2012 results were equally shocking to the Democrat pollsters.

Did the new Democrat wonder boy Nate Silver predict that Obama would get 9 million fewer votes in 2012, and still win?

Of course not.

Did Nate Silver predict that Romney would get 2.4 million votes less than McCain?

Of course not.

Did Nate Silver predict that minority voters would increase by 2% in 2012?

Of course not.

15 posted on 11/07/2012 2:23:26 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen

zeestephen wrote:

“I suspect the 2012 results were equally shocking to the Democrat pollsters.

Did the new Democrat wonder boy Nate Silver predict that Obama would get 9 million fewer votes in 2012, and still win?”

exactly right ! the polls are mostly guessing, the errors associated with nonresponse bias, turnout modelling... etc. dwarf the sampling error.

Nate Silver is the hero of this election, but will be the goat the next time there is a major shift in voting behavior (like 1980)

he’s like an economic forecaster, works fine if this election is like the last election, but if something unexpected happens, he will never see it coming...


60 posted on 11/07/2012 3:47:41 PM PST by Reverend Wright (Obama explains the ALCS: the Yankees actually played great but lost due to mistakes by Joe Torre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson