YOU are right DM is wrong. There is something very strange here. If you had told me yesterday that Obama was in the 60-62M vote range, I would have been ecstatic. Then we hear all the high turn outs all over yesterday, I would have thought 70M - 62M landslide. Theres’ millions and millions of vaporized votes....
I told husband several days ago, after that first debate, that something wasn’t right; that Obama seemed very unconcerned about how the election would turn out. Knowing how he admires tin pot dictators’ election tactics; I suspected that he already knew that the skids were greased for him - as they always have been. He also has the look of shame about him; a strange, stressed look that probably included the events of Benghazi. I don’t know that for sure; just call me suspicious. - All this sort of stuff will eventually catch up with him and the Clintons as well. Bill has that same craven look about him; Hillary, too.
Re “vaporized” votes. Either 1) the pubbies were lying about the turnout they were seeing yesterday or 2) something very fishy is going on.
Let’s here some hard evidence - show us the data - of your information re strong R turnout vis-a-vis the total vote numbers - specifically in OH and PA. Also, it doesn’t really stand up to the anecdotal evidence of people waiting in LONG lines. I have never seen a line so long in a presidential election. If voter turnout was so much lower than 2008 - why the incredibly long lines?