Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer
Hmmmm...your memory of the TEA Party movement is very different than mine. I thought that TEA stood for Taxed Enough Already....


80 posted on 11/07/2012 3:33:33 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Timber Rattler

I think I agree with you on this one;

The Tea Party was about one thing: being taxed for big government spending.

It stuck to that, took on all who felt the same about it - no matter what they thought about other issues.

The focused their power and maximized their forces. Thats how they won.


85 posted on 11/07/2012 3:41:57 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Timber Rattler

The TEA party was T.E.A. initially in it’s Santelli-esque beginnings. It quickly became “Save Medicare from Obama Care” for a large majority of TEA party members polled.

You can’t make TEA by keeping things the same. Nobody is willing to give up Medicare and Social Security in exchange for lower taxes, and greater opportunity and freedom, not even conservatives.

Romney echoed the obvious untruth that somehow we could save Medicare and Social Security for everyone and lower taxes at the same time.

The TEA idea is, of course, sound, but most folks really just didn’t want any change to wildly generous Medicare as their core motivation.

We may as well be honest about the Medicare->TEA party contradiction.


92 posted on 11/07/2012 3:48:53 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson