[Timber Rattler]

I think she’s more of a fighter than that and has taken on a lot stronger challenges than “psychological campaigns”.

You can't run and win if the party says it won't back you.

Regardless, Palin is only a side issue here...the real issue is that the GOP-E plotted and schemed against Conservatives and the TEA party movement to clear the way for Romney, and ended up shooting itself in the foot and dooming us all to four more years of Marxist rule. That's what this thread really is about--pointing out where it all began.

[D-fendr]

Did the “party” say it wouldn’t back Sarah if she entered and won? Who? Who said that?

>>>”Palin is only the side issue here..

I see it as your evidence for your theory. And I see your theory falling on the evidence offered.

But you are right on one part: Palin is a side issue. She didn’t enter the race. You can’t win the primary if you don’t enter; you can’t win the general if you don’t win the primary.

We had a pick of those that entered. Romney defeated those handily. It is debatable now whether that speaks highly of Romney or lowly of the others.

But, Palin is moot.

[itsahoot]

dooming us all to four more years of Marxist rule.

It won't be just four more years Timber.

The GOPe are not friends of the Constitution, the Democrats learned when Reagan ran, that you could just change parties and put an (R) by your name and by gosh Republicans would vote for you.

I surmised that Palin did not run because she was not led of God to do so. If that is the case then we are indeed living under judgement.

Strange that I have not seen one post tonight on what this means for Israel.

[Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand]

You can't run and win if the party says it won't back you.

Just curious.... what did Palin do this fall to back the party's candidate for president?

And contrast that with Marco Rubio, for example, who worked tirelessly to get Romney/Ryan elected.