To: ynotjjr
Paul Ryan was perfect, Marco Rubio wasn’t eligible. They can peddle their poop somewhere else.
2 posted on
11/06/2012 10:32:52 PM PST by
madison10
To: madison10
Yes, yes, yes and more yes... I agreed with you wholeheartedly.
10 posted on
11/06/2012 10:38:25 PM PST by
myrabach
To: madison10
Marco Rubio wasnt eligible. Why isn’t Rubio eligible? Zero was!! Ask the media? I think Rubio would have been a better pick!!! You have several reasons why Mitt lost one was the media kept lying for Zero and that stupid Photo op in New Jersey...
17 posted on
11/06/2012 10:42:12 PM PST by
tallyhoe
To: madison10
Rubio IS 100% eligible.
Those who think otherwise are legal idiots, with absolutely no legal authority on their side.
20 posted on
11/06/2012 10:44:33 PM PST by
Kansas58
To: madison10
How the heck was he perfect? He was a dud. Wisconsin? Really. I swear, I don't like losing as much as some do on this site. Watch Obama take the stage like I am right now. Watch him replace a couple more Supreme Court Judges next year. My Dad use to says about people like some here "they can't stand prosperity" They actually enjoy losing. Marco is the best I have ever heard, and that includes Reagan, at articulating our positions. Excuse me, my President is speaking, he is saying that I need to get ready to move forward. And to the fat f*ck in NJ, Governor just plan to stay inside the borders of NJ for the rest of your life, you turncoat idiot.
23 posted on
11/06/2012 10:50:11 PM PST by
ynotjjr
(Under Construction)
To: madison10
Paul Ryan was perfect, Marco Rubio wasnt eligible. They can peddle their poop somewhere else. Marco 2016!
35 posted on
11/07/2012 12:34:57 AM PST by
cynwoody
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson