1. He's a fat slob with a New Jersey attitude (I'm fine with both of these, by the way), and his "shtick" would not have played well in any swing states.
2. He didn't stand a good chance of bringing his own state into the Republican column in 2012.
3. His career in elected politics has been less than three years in the governor's office in one of the most reliably dysfunctional states in the U.S.
4. His prior career as a Federal prosecutor might have played well in a campaign year where "law and order" were major campaign themes, but not in a year like this where the economy is front-and-center on the national scene.
5. New Jersey's unemployment rate is nearly 10% -- which is more than two points above the national average. Christie still has plenty of work to do in New Jersey.
Personally, I don't think Christie's plans have changed at all. He's going to run for re-election in 2013, and if he loses (or even if he wins), he's going to be angling to serve as the U.S. Attorney General in a second Romney term. He may even be a potential candidate for this post in January 2013.
So there you have it. If you have any evidence that Christie was ever seriously considered as a VP candidate by Romney (or even wanted the job), have at it. Your post is filled with a lot of speculation about an ego that is so irrational that it wouldn't even consider his own huge shortcomings.
As Mitt Romney has once again demonstrated to us, candidates from states east of the Delaware River simply don't do well in national races in this country. I may be wrong about this, but I believe JFK -- in 1960 (more than 50 years ago) was the last person to win at the national level as president or VP on a ticket.
I'm perfectly content to let FReepers reading our exchange judge the size of Christie's ego on the basis of his body of work, which is freely available on YouTube. If, living in New Jersey, you haven't seen it on display locally, I refer you there.