[WOSG]

If you think that Santorum or Gingrich would have done better up against Obama’s “war on women” lies, you are an idiot.

Look at the Senate races as well.
There’s a bunch we should have won, and we didnt.

Splitter did make the difference. Obama may well win Virginia and the margin of difference will be those 3rd party splitters.

Enjoy our new United Socialist States of America.

[SoConPubbie]

If you think that Santorum or Gingrich would have done better up against Obama’s “war on women” lies, you are an idiot.

The only IDIOTS are those conservatives/Republicans who thought it was a good idea to prop up a Pretend Republican like Mitt Romney who supports Abortion and the Gay Agenda.

Those type of people are purely stupid.

[SoConPubbie]

Look at the Senate races as well.
There’s a bunch we should have won, and we didnt.

Blame Romney.

He had no coattails and he depressed voter turnout with his support of Abortion and the Gay Agenda.

Add to that his lack of serious limited Government credentials and his horrific Progressive record as Governor and you have a sure-fired electoral disaster.

[Moseley]

If you think that Santorum or Gingrich would have done better up against Obama’s “war on women” lies, you are an idiot.

Yes, Newt Gingrich would have done better, because he would not just stand there and let his opponent beat him up. You are looking at what actually happened. But a good campaigner would never have allowed the Democrats to get that far. Where a moderate like Romney does not know how to effectively fight the liberals, Gingrich would have taken each attack by Obama, stuffed it down Obama's mouth, and made him eat it.

A good campaigner would have so thoroughly discredited and embarassed the Democrats the SECOND they started to spin up their attack, that the attack would have died in its infancy.

You look at Obama's campaign atacks -- unopposed -- and imagine that it would have been the same with an effective campaigner.