For those of you STILL considering voting 3rd party....

[INVAR]

Thanks SR.

Sometimes it is a lonely road when you stand on those things you have decided you will not waver on, while the rest of the world marches on in lock-step.

But then, wide is that gate.

It’s the narrow one that so many find offensive.

[WVKayaker]

Hey, I'm not the one touting myself as anything special. As for projecting, nobody invited you onto the thread. You came to criticize and demean.

Mission was accomplished!

Yet, you are still here with that air of superiority, making sure that everybody knows you are "special". I agree!

[INVAR]

That’s funny - I thought this was a forum, not an invitation-only opinion board.

On top of that, this thread is addressed to “FOR THOSE OF YOU STILL CONSIDERING VOTING 3RD PARTY”.

Since that address applied to me - in regards to my public stance as far as the top of the ticket is concerned, I’M NOT THE ONE UNINVITED.

You are projecting again, because you came onto a thread addressed to third party voters, - to criticize and demean third party voters as evidenced by all your posts on this thread.

Unless you wish to engage in lying on top of all your other interesting traits you are attempting to project.

[WVKayaker]

So you are voting third party? Who is your darlin'? I have seen no evidence where you support a third. All i see is why you can't support Romney, and are critical of those who do. Your air of religiosity puts you squarely in that Pharisaical group. Your constant harping about MY Christian POV is quite alarming to one who follows and worships our Lord.

Projecting seems your specialty, as you have accused all of us as being in the wrong, when we state our position of support for him! Youkeep going to YOUR POSITION as the only correct possibility. Peter denied Jesus three times before the cock crew...

That seems kinda hypocritical, to me, or maybe just another lie (isn't that your accusation my way?)?

[INVAR]

AGAIN, since you have a deliberate reading comprehension problem -

I’m not going onto pro-Romney threads to castigate, ridicule, demean and insult those who are voting for Romney.

However, threads addressed to ‘principled’ voters; third party voters; and those who refuse to vote for Romney - are the threads I have participated in and have expressed my position without apology or remorse.

YOU, on the other hand, have come onto a thread addressed to those not voting for Romney, to accuse, belittle, castigate and otherwise impugn my faith, because I refused to vote for Romney, considering it a betrayal of my principles and my faith to do so.

For that, you automatically took personal offense.

So the problem is with you.

But I had to laugh at your silly attempt to equate my defense of my position and choice as denying Jesus three times.

That’s choice. The pro homo crowd hasn’t even thought to try and belittle me with that one. Give yourself a pat on the back for a little originality in the accusatory insult department.

[WVKayaker]

yada, yada, yada... with false accusations AGAIN...

...and since homosexual connotations are constantly included, makes me wonder what you are compensating for... hmmmmmmm...

I still haven't seen your SUPPORT for anybody, just ridicule and lofty proclamations for your POV!

You are such a good boy, and I am so wrong... NOT! You keep pontificating and extolling your virtuous self, while you keep your haughty attitude and puerile accusatory attempts at ridicule.

I'm enjoying watching your contortions, though! It makes time pass while I am waiting to hear PRESIDENT-ELECT Romney's acceptance speech!

But, I have other thing of more import, for now!

[roamer_1]

Sometimes it is a lonely road

You ain't alone AT ALL.

It’s the narrow one that so many find offensive.

; )

[INVAR]

Do you even bother to read what you write before hitting ‘post’ Em??

I specifically noted that your castigation, insults, accusations etc., are not any different than the kind received from those who support Homosexual marriage (i.e.: hypocrite, Pharisee, plank in my eye etc., etc.).

So now YOU - think it’s righteous to take that observation out of context, and actually go to subtly assert, I AM COMPENSATING FOR BEING A HOMOSEXUAL?

Have I got that about right in your last? You now accuse me via subtlety, of compensating for being a homosexual because I noted the similarities in accusation from you and those who say the same things about me and my faith because I stand against the homosexual agenda?

What kind of Christian do you assume of yourself again?

Your posts are self incriminating if you even have a shred of cognitive capablity.

[WVKayaker]