Back in #44 (remember that?) you said:
This is why when I’m driving and I see elitist types like this woman here and cyclists dressed in their cycling get-up ,like some modern version of a Medieval Harlequin, I come as close as I can to running them off the road without actually hitting them.
So ... at least one of those statements is false; they contradict each other. Regardless, you have presented both as truth. Which is it? Either one, or will you come up with yet another contradictory claim?
The rest of your post is really quite amusing. Your pathetic attempt to discern my background by analyzing my posting style is a miserable failure, and doesn't exactly cover you with glory.
Bye. If you have anything further to say, then I shall taunt you again to-morrow.
God, you’re amusing. I know what I said. You’re attempts to back track on who you are are the funniest part of your rantings. Again, thanks for so much free parking in your head . I rather enjoy spinning you up. I especially like how you dodge my questions. Really, where does this attitude of moral superiority come from in you?