Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
Why not fire on the targets? Did ROE prevent engagement?
Congress asks not? If not now, when?
One would think the drive-bys would want to know?
Unless as has been said, it does not fit the template.
Guess we should just believe all not asking why
have our best interests there in play for us.
Where does one go if what one believes does not fit the template?
An apology TigersEye, am simply frustrated coverage
has not broken forth in full force.
25 posted on 11/04/2012 9:02:50 AM PST by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: no-to-illegals
Fire with what? That's the question. The PTB have admitted that there were two drones overhead but have not said whether or not they were armed. They have said that nothing else was in the air and from all we know from other sources that would seem to be true. No rescue was sent.

Only the POTUS had the authority to act!

28 posted on 11/04/2012 9:09:57 AM PST by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson