Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gandalftb

“Significant national security issues”? And the press wouldn’t report those just like the New York Times didn’t publish THE PENTAGON PAPERS. They were asked not to report Abu Ghraib, but some naked Moslem men are more important than covering the story about four dead Americans in Benghazi? Baloney.


8 posted on 11/04/2012 8:09:07 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6

The Pentagon Papers were mostly after-the-fact reporting and didn’t discuss ongoing tactical events.

Au Ghraib was reported by the Army personnel on site. Those reports went viral, so no valid comparison there.

The press knows very little about the tactical situation in N Africa and only in bits and pieces, not enough to report.

Our media is obviously in the bag for Obama, but they are also careful to stay away from ongoing operations.


11 posted on 11/04/2012 8:35:24 AM PST by gandalftb (The art of diplomacy says "nice doggie", until you find a bigger rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson