I take is it was a kidnapping gone bad—They were to take the ambassador with little loss of life. Obama would make an appeal or fly to Libya and get his release. This would show him as a leader and a respected American. Then, he would (after the election) release the Blind Sheikh—for humanitarian reasons to the Muslim Brotherhood. The fly in the ointment was the two Seals who came in out of the blue and shot so many terrorists (some say 60) that in anger, they killed or beat up the ambassador so badly —he died. Bruce Willis should do this as a “Die Hard” film. Those two were true patriots—and they may well have unseated Obama’s bid for power—for that alone they should be honored. Don’t worry all the paper trail has been shredded—but I don’t think Hillary will go to prison to cover his tail.
Full Agreement FRiend.
Sorry, the whole kidnapping scenario makes no sense. Letting your ambassador be kidnapped - weak. The President of the US begging a bunch of guerillas for the ambassador’s release - weak. Releasing the blind terrorist for the ambassador - weak, weak, weak.
What would actually have made Obama look good is backing up the two SEALs who raced to the rescue and giving them a hero’s welcome home - basking in their glory, lapped in the mantle of their courage and victory.
IMO, Obama just cared more about not making the Libyan government that he installed look weak, than he did about saving the lives of Americans - and not just any Americans but the Ambassador and his staff and the brave, brave men who defended them.