Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Nevada Supreme Court intervenes in possible forced abortion case
Life Site News ^ | Fri Nov 02, 2012 21:31 EST | Kirsten Andersen

Posted on 11/03/2012 8:00:07 AM PDT by GonzoII


BREAKING: Nevada Supreme Court intervenes in possible forced abortion case

by Kirsten Andersen

Fri Nov 02 9:31 PM EST

Carson City, NV – November 2, 2012 (LifeSiteNews) – The Nevada Supreme Court late Friday responded to a motion for stay filed by the attorney representing the family of a disabled pregnant woman who may be forced by Nevada’s 2nd District Court to abort her baby against the wishes of her legal guardians.

Elisa Bauer, 32, is mentally disabled and suffers from epilepsy as a result of the fact that her birth mother drank heavily while pregnant. She is eleven weeks pregnant. No one knows the exact circumstances under which she became pregnant, but those familiar with the case, including her adoptive parents and their lawyer, say she often wandered away from her group home and had sexual encounters with men at nearby truck stops and casinos.

Her adoptive parents, Bill and Amy Bauer, say she wants to keep the baby and give it up for adoption.  Judge Egan Walker is considering overruling that decision. 

A hearing was held Thursday to hear testimony from medical experts to help the judge decide whether to force Elisa to abort. During the hearing a doctor summoned by judge Walker recommended an abortion, while a doctor called by the parents said an abortion carries risks of its own.

Attorney Jason Guinasso petitioned the Supreme Court early Friday to halt the lower court’s proceedings, arguing that Judge Egan Walker stepped outside the bounds of his authority by seeking to overrule decisions made by her legally-appointed guardians.  Friday evening, the Supreme Court responded, acknowledging the merits of Guinasso’s concerns and questioning the lower court’s authority to intervene in decisions made by Elisa’s guardians without first seeking to have their guardianship legally revoked.

The Supreme Court has given the 2nd District Court until noon on Monday to respond to Mr. Guinasso’s arguments.

Guinasso was encouraged by the Court’s unusually quick response.  “We are very pleased the Nevada Supreme court has taken this matter up,” he said, “and is forcing someone to address whether the District Court have the legal authority to conduct these rogue proceedings.” Added Guinasso, “We are also pleased that the Nevada Supreme Court has recognized the merits of our position that the District Court does not have that authority [to overrule the wishes of Elisa’s duly appointed guardians].”

Guinasso says it is possible the Supreme Court may decide the matter as early as Monday evening.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: abortion; courts; law; moralabsolutes; prolife
"Friday evening, the Supreme Court responded, acknowledging the merits of Guinasso’s concerns and questioning the lower court’s authority to intervene in decisions made by Elisa’s guardians without first seeking to have their guardianship legally revoked."

Well, at least a little sanity is showing up.

1 posted on 11/03/2012 8:00:18 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Related
2 posted on 11/03/2012 8:01:04 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Now wait a minute, I thought government was suppose to leave women’s wombs alone! They can’t have it both ways! This just ticks me off to no end. If they are allowed to abort this woman’s baby against her wishes, what is to stop them from going even further? It’s either a woman’s choice or it isn’t. Where are the Pro Choice people when the Mother wants to keep her baby? Hypocrites!


3 posted on 11/03/2012 8:30:38 AM PDT by happilymarriedmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Why is this even in court in the first place? If she wants the baby and her guardians want her to have the baby, who brought this to court to try to force an abortion? Who even has legal standing to pursue such an action?


4 posted on 11/03/2012 8:38:32 AM PDT by pjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pjd

Washoe County Social Services initiated the suit. It is debatable whether they have legal standing to do so.


5 posted on 11/03/2012 9:05:31 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
May nefarious do-gooders rot in hell.
6 posted on 11/03/2012 9:10:20 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (Muppet season now open - no bag limit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Hopefully there are sane, moral men or women on the Nev. Supreme Court who will prevent this great evil. It is wrong on so many levels.

7 posted on 11/04/2012 3:52:54 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson