Ambassador Stevens defied all the warnings, signals and real dangers himself to trek off to remote Benghazi while vastly underarmed for some reason. What was it?
Was he so ideologically bent, in the way of most Leftists, that he defied both the odds and human reason, or, like some sixties flower child thought somehow that smiling, trusting diplomacy and tolerance and endless negotiation with the blood thirsty would win the day?
What the heck was an ambassador doing in the enemy camp region?
His assignment may be what they want to keep a lid on.
Yep. The story strains credulity. Amb. Stevens was in Benghazi for the opening of a hospital, or was it a school? And doing this was so important that he went directly into a terrible security situation that he was well apprised of, and on 9/11 to boot? And what about that Turkish ambassador who was his last meeting of the day, right before the attack? Who is this person? What was so important that this meeting couldn't take place in relatively secure Tripoli?