No its strong-arm politics...none of the MSM nor polls are clean of libturd corruption.
YUP BOSS, GOT RASS COVERED!
I think the tightening of the polls is the residual effect of Romney going “moderate” in the last debate, putting in the performance we were all afraid he would in all the debates. Enough time has passed that it’s starting to get hard for people to remember how he did in the first debate. He peaked too early. It’s not good that Obama has regained the momentum going into the weekend before the election.
The debates were still the best exposure Romney were got. The election will be two weeks after the last debate. Romney was doing his worst during the couple weeks between the conventions and the first debate. His campaign advertising and messaging has always been lousy. And without direct, unfiltered exposure of Romney himself, the media defines him the way Obama wants him to be defined.
If there were 3 weeks between the last debate and the election instead of 2, it’d be all over for Romney. As it is now, it’s a true coin toss. He’s losing ground thanks to being forced to rely again on his campaign’s weak, confused, unfocused advertising to get his message across.
Whatever troll
There is no real tightening and, in fact, the Obama campaign is being hit with shots from all across the spectrum:
1) each day there is a new shoe dropped on Benghazi;
2)he has been losing ground in every state poll across the board;
3)he is speaking before small, unenthusiastic groups; 4)Romney is speaking before large, enthusiastic crowds at events where thousands have been turned away due to lack of space;
5)The Disaster is being challenged in states which he long ago believed to be locked up
6)(hence the RATs’ internal polls are indicating disaster).
I could go on and on.