Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesThe Hammer

Krugman social theories are abject failures and Obama proves it. While he may be an solid Economist when it comes to the already known, his theories are way way left field.

It’s appropriate that he sees brotherhood with Nate Silver, they both just don’t understand it. Alone and in that booth or hovering over that peace of paper, people are just going to have a nagging feeling about voting for Obama.

You go to a real professional gambler and try and get Nate Silver’s odds on Obama winning, and they’ll laugh at you.

Intrade is paramutual and doesn’t reflect the true reality.


5 posted on 11/01/2012 4:07:40 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Well Paulie boy is defending Nate, how precious.

Nate uses statistics, how impressive. However Natie and Paulie have forgotten the basics of computer analysis.

GIGO, Garbage IN, Garbage OUT.

When you average polls with a false premise (the 2008 turnout model)the results of the analysis are GARBAGE.

This will be clear next Wed, but the libs will just attribute it to racism.....


6 posted on 11/01/2012 7:16:44 AM PDT by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson