Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NELSON111

I disagree. Even though the polls in September were skewed +D, it still was a tie at best. People defaulted to Obama until they knew that the challenger was someone capable. They probably just defaulted their choice until a credible choice presented itself. That first debate was the catalyst, and the preference cascade has started. People are jumping off the Obama bandwagon now, as they see that it is ok to do so.


33 posted on 10/30/2012 2:25:22 PM PDT by gman4bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: gman4bush
I mostly agree with this. I think it was pretty close at one point, but the underlying reality is that the majority of Americans who aren't news junkies are paying enough attention to know that they very badly want a new President. Romney convinced them he was a safe choice.

That was essentially the same dynamic in 1980. Voters really wanted to dump Carter; but until Reagan destroyed the myth that he was a right-wing crazy they weren't ready for him. The contrast is nearly as stark now: Romney is no Reagan, but 0bama is Carter on steroids.

54 posted on 10/30/2012 3:08:20 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson