This is a longshot, but it serves to indicate how poorly Obama 2012 is doing compared to Obama 2008. In 2008 Obama won Oregon by 16%. This poll shows him up by 6% with an MOE of 5%.
To: Palmetto Patriot
2 posted on
10/30/2012 6:07:25 AM PDT by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Palmetto Patriot
“women”?
No, not married women with husbands and families.
“Women” who want consequence-free fornication (”like a man can”), yes.
“Women” who want the gov’t to be their proxy father/husband, yes.
That’s whom he has support from.
3 posted on
10/30/2012 6:12:24 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Palmetto Patriot
What’s the spread with men?
I bet Romney is leading by double digits with white men in OR.
Why would a fishwrap liberal paper mention the “gender gap” if O had good news with male voters?
4 posted on
10/30/2012 6:12:27 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved FrieGrnd Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Palmetto Patriot
Obama is only leading by 6 in a poll that has a 5% MOE and getting 47%. He is toast here too.
Pray for America
9 posted on
10/30/2012 6:25:55 AM PDT by
bray
(Nov 6, tell Obama to Stand Down!)
To: Palmetto Patriot
I don’t know about “women” exactly. We had a great experience of living in Eugene. We, at that time in our lives, we’re amused at the politics there. It was foreign to us but fun to watch. BUT, “women” by normal definition? I don’t think so.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson