Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
It all boils down to a key factor which is granting

CROSS-BORDER AUTHORITY.

Everything I have read and seen so far is still confirming my initial thinking on the matter, going way back to my days as a NavSpecWar officer who took a SEAL det to Beirut a long time ago.

Once the alarm is sent from Benghazi, dozens of HQs are notified and are in the loop in real time, including AFRICOM and EURCOM, both located in Germany.

Without waiting for orders, they begin planning and executing rescue operations, including getting air support over Benghazi ASAP. But one thing they CANNOT DO without explicit orders from the POTUS is cross an international border. That is the big "red line."

All POTUS has to do is NOT grant cross-border authority, and the entire rescue (already in progress) must stop in its tracks. Ships can loiter on station, but planes fall out of the sky, so they must be redirected to an air base (Sigonella Sicily) to await the POTUS decision on granting CBA. If it never comes, the men in Behghazi must rely only on assets already "in country" in Libya, such as the Tripoli QRF and the Predators.

(And possibly AC-130s that might already have been in Libya: they were last year, but their location on 9-11-2012 is unknown. If they were "in country" but were prevented from firing, that is another situation.)

So if at the 5pm DC time meeting with Panetta and Biden, Obama said, "No outside military action," meaning no CBA will be granted, then THAT IS IT. Case closed.

That constitutes "standing orders" all the way down the chain of command via Panetta to Ham and the subordinate commands trying to rescue the men in Benghazi.

If Obama then goes upstairs to the family quarters to watch TV or sleep, or otherwise makes himself "unavailable," then his last standing orders will stand until he changes them, even if he goes to sleep until the morning of 9-12. Nobody in the chain of command below him can countermand his "standing orders" not to send military forces from outside of Libya into Libyan air space.

Nobody.

Personally, I think he left "no outside miltary intervention, no cross-border authority" standing orders, and then he went to bed. Damn him to hell.

(And to me, the most damning aspect of all is that Obama went to bed while his Ambassador was still missing and presumed kidnapped by Al Queda. Ambassador Stevens might have been on a Youtube video pleading for his life, ready to get the Nick Berg/Danny Pearl "intro to jihad" treatment, and Obama WENT TO BED to rest up for his much more important fund raiser in Las Vegas!)


9 posted on 10/29/2012 6:18:18 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee

I hate to say it, but nonetheless, I personally believe that the Ambassador being kidnapped was the plan.

Obama did not want that interfered with and the next morning when he found that the Ambassador was dead...then the spin, cover-up, etc. began.

Then, all of these last six weeks running up to the election would ahve been filled with news about him herocially negotiating an “honorable” release of the Ambassador...probably late this week.

I might add, I cannot and do not believe Stevens would have had any idea or knowledge of this.

Walking Al Quida in Benghazi
http://www.jeffhead.com/walkingalquida.htm


10 posted on 10/29/2012 6:26:18 AM PDT by Jeff Head ( Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee
First of all, thank you for your service. Second, thanks for posting the graphics. They are profoundly spot-on. If I could post them at work without being fired I would. (I work at a large University in a Mid-Atlantic state where the much-lauded notion of Diversity means merely diversity of skin color, not thought. Unfortunately the Obama Economy is so bad, it's about the only place to have a job these days. But I digress.)

It all boils down to a key factor which is granting CROSS-BORDER AUTHORITY.

During the crisis, yes. But afterwards? It all boils down to the mendacity of the Main Stream Media. Consider: no one died in Watergate. But Woodward & Bernstein nevertheless worked hard to expose it.

Now? The modern Woodwards & Bernsteins are actively covering up both Benghazi and the Obama Administration's feckless defense of blaming the YouTube video. Too bad Obama doesn't have an "R" after his name. A modern-day Woodward & Bernstein would have the story of their careers.

Just my 2¢.

12 posted on 10/29/2012 6:42:48 AM PDT by Two-Shoes (The Second Amendment exists to guarantee & give teeth to the First.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson