Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did Obama choose to “stand down” in Benghazi? (Best explanation of motive I've read.)
PowerLine ^ | October 27, 2012 | Paul Mirengoff

Posted on 10/28/2012 8:11:58 AM PDT by StandAndDeliver1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last
To: Cvengr
"Who had the authority to direct AFRICOM second in command to relieve his senior?"

Wondered about that, too. Petraeus? Petraeus, under C in C orders?

141 posted on 10/28/2012 7:13:43 PM PDT by hummingbird (Obama campaigns right in our faces. Doesn't bother him at all-it bothers me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Sorry for burp on 127.


142 posted on 10/28/2012 7:19:25 PM PDT by hummingbird (Obama campaigns right in our faces. Doesn't bother him at all-it bothers me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Good add ons


143 posted on 10/28/2012 7:20:25 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
"Thanks to the mainstream media’s complicity..."

...and their liberalism and stupidity and incompetence. MSM is complicit. Do they know it. They should report on THEMSELVES or each other. (right)

144 posted on 10/28/2012 7:24:35 PM PDT by hummingbird (Obama campaigns right in our faces. Doesn't bother him at all-it bothers me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Petraeus is CIA, retired from the military.

The guy would be Gen. Martin Dempsey, CJCS, who is, coincidentally, in Israel meeting with Ehud Barak, the leftist Israeli Defense Minister who likely will lose his seat in the Kenesset.


145 posted on 10/28/2012 7:38:44 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: StandAndDeliver1

They chose not to send help because they were caught with their pants down. Why is the US in Libya recovering weapons that belong to Libya? What right does the US have to send the US military into a country that we are not at war with? What right does the US have to have spies blowing up Libyans? It would have taken cue balls that BamBam doesn’t have to send in the help that would have saved Doherty and Woods. As it was, BamBam sent in a quick reaction force that had to have permission from the Libyan government every step of the way to the safe house and back to the airport. As it is, Doherty and Woods can be painted as rogue warriors who violated official orders from BamBam. It is a pretty clear message that Obama is a coward.


146 posted on 10/28/2012 7:53:32 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Well, the MB is AQ. And AQ is inextricably linked to Iran (Iran has done safehousing both for the bin Ladens, Zawahiri and al Amriki. And Jarret is Iranian.

We watched the MB recruiting suicide candidates 6 days before the original 9.11.

One of the recruiters was at O’s Cairo speech.

Oh, and one Pak minister declared a long time ago that Obama is the new global Kaliph.


147 posted on 10/28/2012 9:38:45 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (I will fear no muslim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Nope.

Only the NCA, specifically the CinC, POTUS.


148 posted on 10/29/2012 4:22:46 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

CJCS doesn’t have that authority (C&S 101). Only the Natl Command Authority or President would be in his operational command chain. SecDef might also have the authority, but technically the NCA forms the JTFs and is the only one with authority to terminate those commands. Joint Chiefs provide staffing support and are generally used by POTUS to coordinate between higher authority and the CinCs.


149 posted on 10/29/2012 4:52:53 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
"Petraeus is CIA, retired from the military.

The guy would be Gen. Martin Dempsey, CJCS."

Thanks for education, jjotto.

150 posted on 10/30/2012 9:31:11 AM PDT by hummingbird (Obama campaigns right in our faces. Doesn't bother him at all, does it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Interesting.

Why do you suppose Panetta cited Dempsey as one of the principal decision-makers?


151 posted on 10/30/2012 11:58:52 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson