Posted on 10/26/2012 5:32:09 PM PDT by servo1969
Having a back and forth with a former legendary Delta operator. Here is the gist of what he is implying:
Having spent a good bit of time nursing a GLD (ground Laser Designator) in several garden spots around the world, something from the report jumped out at me.One of the former SEALs was actively painting the target. That means that Specter WAS ON STATION! Probably an AC130U. A ground laser designator is not a briefing pointer laser. You do not "paint" a target until the weapons system/designator is synched; which means that the AC130 was on station.Only two places could have called off the attack at that point; the WH situation command (based on POTUS direction) or AFRICOM commander based on information directly from the target area.If the AC130 never left Sigonella (as Penetta says) that means that the Predator that was filming the whole thing was armed.If that SEAL was actively "painting" a target; something was on station to engage! And the decision to stand down goes directly to POTUS!
This is far bigger than Watergate.
The second worst feeling in the world has to be the platform crew being desperately asked for help, given a clear target and then having to stand down and watch your fellow Americans die.
The worst has to be the team on the ground knowing that the President just left you to die.
Update: Even with two Predators on station, one unarmed and filming and one armed, the call to stand down comes from the same sources. Earlier today, Bob Owens at PJ Media posts about the responsibility of the order to call off the mission as well as some good info about the AC130s on station.
Update 2: From Adam Baldwin and many of you, here is an audio interview between Rush Limbaugh and a caller identifying as a retired SF Lieutenant Colonel and Special Operations planner for 15 years.
From The Right Scoop:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lljKmmZyCiw
Update 3: Jeff Emanuel thinks that we might be jumping to conclusions and that Jennifer Griffin at FoxNews might have misreported a statement about active laser on a target. I highly respect Jeff and Jennifer. And either could be correct right now. Hopefully, we'll get some clarification.
Update 4: From quoted retired Delta operator, "Jeff is correct (about lasing without air asset) but the only reason you would do that is to determine a specific grid for indirect fire which the SEAL did not have available. You are in an active firefight against mortars and MGs; there is only one reason to cease returning fire and paint a target and it ain't because you thought it was a good time to pull a PMCS on your fucking GLD."
Update 5: The only way I buy that the former SEAL was lasing the target without an active asset to synch to and destroy the target...maybe, just maybe, it was a last stand move. Maybe he did that to give the inbounds a target if he didn't make it...
Update 6: Another (very very trusted) source is saying that the AC130 resources were in the middle of a rotation and that the new resources weren't ready yet so no help would come from Sigonella. So that confirms Panetta's statement.
Ping
I know when Obama is lying.. when his mouth is moving.. yup!
gunships in the middle of a rotation on sept 11 ?????
BHO2 doesn’t make the decisions - Valerie Jarrett makes the decisions in that White House. And no one is willing to come forward and state the obvious!
Bookmarked.
No doubt about it, Obama should be impeached immediately!!!! Panetta, Clinton, Rice, Carney, etc. should all be fired in disgrace!!!! I could easily curse these traitors out for eternity.....but my heart is so broken, weeping for those four brave, hero, Americans, Obama deserted and left them out to dry & die, in slaughter and death. God will make his righteous justice with Obama and his evil, hate America minions as he see fit!!!
I have a hard heart. I didn’t know any of these guys. But I am weeping as I hear these accounts of this vast evil overcoming the Good.
O God, how long? Will You let the forces of the devil triumph? Come quickly, Lord Jesus!
This is fascinating. But, some of us are not familiar with your military terminology. Could you state it in 2 or 3 simple sentences that would explain it to the man on the street? I’ll share it far and wide, if you can.
MSM on total ignore of this story.
This generation’s Watergate.
...my reaction as well, we earlier heard all systems were GO, specialized groups were “in place” military rotation never leaves an opening, never.
you don’t need all this to prove that Obama is lying about Benghazi
How does this fit in?
Strangely, 0bama decided to stick with the 'Anti-Islam video' narrative even though it didn't make sense any more to do so. 0bama went Islamic extremist, mentioning the 'video' SIX TIMES in his U.N. speech. Worse, he said "The future does not belong to those who insult the Prophet Mohammed". In doing so he denounced 'freedom of speech' in America while promoting Sharia Law (Note that the maker of this 'video' was IMMEDIATELY ARRESTED and is STILL in jail pending trial AFTER the election). It is against Sharia Law to insult the Prophet Mohammed; punishable by death. 0bama essentially denounced our Constitution. Apparently, he thinks the "future does not belong to" any culture where freedom of speech reigns supreme, including the United States of America.
0bama should be immediately brought before Congress for impeachment hearings for advocating the overthrow of America's founding principles.
This is thee most damning evidence i have seen so far. With Petreaus' statement today, i believe the dam is about to burst.
It will only take one leak of the flight schedules to show who/what was overhead, that the Ops guys would have assumed could have sent missiles onto the target he was painting.
0bama should be very afraid. When he loses the election he will become one of the most hated persons in the leftist world. The MSM may turn on him like a pack of hyenas.
I’m wondering if 0bama lies on purpose to generate chaos, resulting in all of our sources and methods being known for all the world to see. A way for 0bama to embassass the United States and blow it’s cover in the world of intelligence.. Like the Pakistani doctor who worked for us.. In jail now for decades to come.. All covers blown.. This is 0bama’s dangerous legacy. Will we ever recover? We recovered from Carter’s similar undoings. Barely. This time it could be irreversible.. 0bama’s thrown entire countries, once our allies, to the enemies side.
The WH (Obama, Jarrett, etc.) felt that the lives of these men were not worth the political price that failure would bring.
So they decided to let them die.
It’s as simple as that.
bump
Proof that the President is Lying about Benghazi?
His lips are moving and sound is comming out!
Help me out here; I think what you say is entirely plausible. So why did they allow these people to die? Was it so they would not be around to tell the truth about what happened?
0bama was worried that any rescue attempt failure with fatalities would be compared to Carter’s ‘botched helicopter rescue’ in Iran. I think that’s the ONLY thing they were worried about at that time; IMPACT TO CAMPAIGN. Throw in a pinch of denial and attempt to cover-up.
0bama was worried that any rescue attempt failure with fatalities would be compared to Carter’s ‘botched helicopter rescue’ in Iran. I think that’s the ONLY thing they were worried about at that time; IMPACT TO CAMPAIGN. Throw in a pinch of denial and attempt to cover-up.
Who, at the White House of all places even KNEW ABOUT THIS RETARDED VIDEO ? (Innocence of Muslims)
I pulled it up early on the 12th and there were only 300 or so views.
They certainly didn’t go out and seek something they could pin this on.
Someone at the WH knew about this Innocence of Muslims video ahead of time.
Maybe CIA knew folks in the ME were having chatter about it.
Were the Egypt protests the prior day about this stupid video ?
How do we know this ?
No one knows the future. They had sent an available force that was in country. That force was delayed. The former Seals had driven off several attacks and had survived for several hours. They may have thought that they would make it without bringing assets from out of country.
It could be simple incompetence aggravated by political machinations and a willingness to coverup and prevaricate, believeing that the MSM can and will cover for you.
“If there was a rotation, the Ops guys would have known about it.
This is thee most damning evidence i have seen so far. With Petreaus’ statement today, i believe the dam is about to burst.”
God. I hope you’re right.
0bama was notified immediately and automatically when the Benghazi consulate triggered the "Critical Incident Report" alert. He did nothing.
Judge Jeanine Investigates Benghazi Gate Part 4 - 10/20/2012 video 6:53
Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer (U.S. Army ret.), former CIA Station Chief Gary Burtson and former CIA operative Mike Baker
Howie Carr interview with Col. Hunt On The Newest Libyan Revelations audio 28:37
There are three scandals here...
---------------------------------------------------------
Denial of requests for security were a dereliction of duty. The lies and misdirection about the "video" after the attack were fraud and malfeasance under the color of authority. The inaction during the attack was something more than that.
The failure to act during the attack is the direct equivalent of desertion IMO.
ONE man had the authority to act that night.
ONE man deserted his post!
EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say
0bama Is A Deserter!
Well written.
You know, if true, the whole thing was so transparent because it was leaked weeks before that Obama may be letting the blind creep go. He denied it....or somebody did. This set up smelled from the beginning and would have been easy to prove. Even I posted my suspicians weeks before on FR. We just don’t have any ankle-biters on our side. McCain? Graham? Give me a break. Breitbart is gone.
Who will impeach?
Reports from Fox today stated that the seals had ‘painted a laser target’ on the mortar nest of the terrorists. Quite a few military guys picked up on that ditty and helped to blow this whole coverup out of the water. This is an important piece of the puzzle to prove Obama and Panetta are lying!!
I will bet, you can’t find a reference, to the Arab protests prior to Sept. 11th 2012, that are connected to the “Innocence of Muslims video.
Here’s just one report:
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/09/10/jihadis-threaten-to-burn-u-s-embassy-in-cairo/
Jihadis Threaten to Burn U.S. Embassy in Cairo
September 10, 2012 - 4:20 pm
Jihadi groups in Egypt, including Islamic Jihad, the Sunni Group, and Al Gamaa Al Islamiyya have issued a statement threatening to burn the U.S. Embassy in Cairo to the ground.
According to El Fagr, they are calling for the immediate release of the Islamic jihadis who are imprisonment and in detention centers in the U.S. including Guantanamo Bay: The group, which consists of many members from al-Qaeda, called [especially] for the quick release of the jihadi [mujahid] sheikh, Omar Abdul Rahman [the “Blind Sheikh”], whom they described as a scholar and jihadi who sacrificed his life for the Egyptian Umma, who was ignored by the Mubarak regime, and [President] Morsi is refusing to intervene on his behalf and release him, despite promising that he would. The Islamic Group has threatened to burn the U.S. Embassy in Cairo with those in it, and taking hostage those who remain [alive], unless the Blind Sheikh is immediately released.
THAT is what I see as the obstacle also. It is entirely possible that she runs the White House, as well as Obama.
However, this vacancy of the pres ceding everything will cause many to jump ship, cross over and aim fire on the dereliction of duty. It’s already happening, as drips will become a stream.
So do you think the source is lying about there not being an aircraft immediately available at Sigonella, or do you think they screwed up the rotation schedule either deliberately or out of incompetence? What do you think is going on?
Would Obama have authorized the drone to be there? Who would have determined whether the drone (either the original or the one that replaced it) had hellfires on them?
The thing that leads me to believe it was not incompetence or just wanting to not have a Jimmy Carter moment right before the election is the refusals in advance to allow more security for Stevens.
And the fact that the White House knew anything about this video that had hardly any views and was created/uploaded by a terrorist cousin of Walid Shoebat who has connections with the Muslim Brotherhood (that planned the 9-11 shenanigans in Egypt), as well as linking to Obama stuff.
Those things really look like advance preparations for this event, not just incompetence. Obama vetoed his Secretary of State to make sure that Stevens was not protected, after a 40-foot hole had been blown in the wall of the consulate. That’s not incompetence. Obama can say he didn’t know about added requests for security, but if Hillary requested additional security and it got vetoed, my understanding is that there is only one person who could have done it. Obama HAD to know, and he personally made sure that Stevens was unprotected.
How could a lead rain storm falling on the moon cultists surrounding the consulate ever cause a Jimmy Carter moment?
I think Hillary, or the State Dept., jumped the gun on blaming the attacks on the video.
It looks to me that the very first reports regarding the video came from a State Dept. press release and was picked up by the media. I read one report that suggested the video played a role in Egypt, but that report only came out after Benghazi attacks. All other reports, prior to Sept. 11 regarding Egypt involved the release of prisoners etc.
That being said, I think 0bama tried to give Hillary some cover on this.
I also believe Hillary has the goods on 0bama.
`
According to people in Cairo ... no.
I can SEE Obunga pulling punches to protect fellow ragheads because he IS one. But Vallerie Jarrett? I know she was born somewhere in the ME, but is she actually a raghead, too? Why would SHE call off the dogs?
“This generations Watergate.”
Yep, and so many don’t know a thing about this one. Incredibly sad state of affairs.
May I use that image? It cuts right to the chase!
“There’s a broader lesson to be learned here,” Mr. Obama told “60 Minutes” correspondent Steve Kroft at the White House. “And I — you know, Governor Romney seems to have a tendency to shoot first and aim later. And as president, one of the things I’ve learned is you can’t do that. That, you know, it’s important for you to make sure that the statements that you make are backed up by the facts. And that you’ve thought through the ramifications before you make ‘em.”
Well, Tucker, Valerie Jarrett is the shadow President, the person actually making presidential decisions. BHO2 is just a puppet for the communists in Chicago.
The situation might be far more heinous.
The assets which might be scrounged from the Annex probably had the technical constraints described from 1-2 decade old technology. National intel assets might not be so primitive.
While generally it is the target that is painted when lazed, it isn’t inconceivable that more advanced technologies at the national level might be able to trace both the paintor and the paintee.
Dropping mortars at night on moving targets isn’t easy, unless maybe 120mm rounds. If this is a coordinated black op company sized attack, with say 2 platoons of politically motivated militants for screening and canon fodder, and one wpns plt for supporting arms and one maneuver element, then they likely had something like a knee mortar or a 60mm mortar or a Russian variant. Well trained infantry from Korean War era could place mortar rounds with correction with about 5ft accuracy at say 1000yds, but most mortar men in daylight and registered fires at preplanned targets might have 30yd accuracies and lesser trained 3rd world militias can be off by a couple 100 yds of their aiming points. At nighttime, figure 50yd accuracy for militias.
I don’t know what these guys have in their arsenals, but if they were lazing their targets, that means they have line of sight on their targets and their targets can also acquiesce them by direct observation, though in darkness.
If weapon platforms weren’t aloft for them to synch their laze, they might have lazed to provide national assets target ID for other platforms to acquiesce.
On the other hand, in the world of BlackOps, and at national level resources, once they paint the target, they themselves might be painting themselves to national resources. If a weapons platform was aloft, whoever operated the controls might also have been directed to eliminate either as a target.
If the controlling authority was cold enough to tell them to stand down as they were acquiesced by mortar fire, it also might be cold enough to target the heroes to control the situation. IMHO, it would be far easier a shot for national resources to take out the ex-SEALS than for some militant band of Muslims with scrounged weapons and zeal to take them out with mortars at night, while on the move, and changing scenarios from their original plan.
Of course this is all conjecture,..worlds of possible worlds, ..theoretical conspiracy theory,...we’ll probably will never know all of it, but it would be nice to know why the people are never informed of the wars our nation is leading even when they are supposedly are being phased out.
...the drones would probably been in operation normally for observation purposes because of the recent unrest and activities. The aircraft (c-130’s and others) would have been ready period. Crews and operators on alert 24/7 for weeks before hand, special operations prepared to go at anytime always in Europe. They were alerted and already had made decisions,(moves) when it first occured. Aircraft for rotation purposes are in constant readiness period. The drones operation was probably more observation than engagement,but still most likely lightly armed.
The excuse they are using for why things didn’t go forward
are bogus, as far as what Penetta is saying is beyond me.
Sigonella is normally used as a rotation base to ferry military personal and equipment all over...ALL OVER...the special operators and aircraft were not in rotation per say....but stationed (on assignment)within two hours of Libya
Very interesting, especially in view that the FBI “couldn’t get there” for about a month, even though US journalists could. Was the FBI kept away until all evidence of how the Seals died was obliterated?
MSM on total ignore of this story.
This generations Watergate.
Then its high time to get in their face about it (to use our dear liars phrase).
This is turning out to be a cluster f of epic proportions shame them into covering it.
Post links and articles about in their forums; e-mail their reporters about it.
Make it ridiculous that they could even think about ignoring the story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.