Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Extract those methane hydrates.
1 posted on 10/25/2012 9:30:04 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

ocean farts


2 posted on 10/25/2012 9:31:59 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Yes indeed, it’s there for the taking.... use it or lose it.


3 posted on 10/25/2012 9:37:20 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

And whom are they blaming for shifting the Gulf Stream?


4 posted on 10/25/2012 9:42:12 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Text near the top, where people skim just to get the jist of the article:

A changing Gulf Stream is warming deep waters along the eastern United States and destabilizing greenhouse gases trapped in sediments.

Somewhere off the eastern coast of North Carolina, a frozen mixture of water and methane gas tucked in seabed sediments is starting to break down. Researchers blame a shifting Gulf Stream — the swift Atlantic Ocean current that flows north from the Gulf of Mexico — which is now delivering warmer waters to areas that had previously only experienced colder temperatures.

The rest of the story, after all the skimmers are runnng away screaming in panic:

“We know methane hydrates exist here and, if warming continues, it can potentially lead to less stable sediments in this region,” says Matthew Hornbach, a marine geologist at the Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, who led the study that is published online today in Nature1. The results suggest that the warmer temperatures are destabilizing up to 2.5 gigatonnes of methane hydrate along the continental slope of the eastern United States. This region is prone to underwater landslides, which could release the methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. Whether that methane would make it to the atmosphere and worsen global warming is unclear, but scientists think that it is unlikely. “We don’t need to worry about any huge blow of methane into the atmosphere,” says Carolyn Ruppel, a geophysicist at the US Geological Survey in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Rather, she says, Hornbach and his co-author Benjamin Phrampus, also of the Southern Methodist University, have uncovered a powerful new way to use data from the geological record to catch non-anthropogenic climate changes that are already happening...

Wonderful, balanced article. Yes, they can claim they put the doubtful parts in, but way after they used hysteria to hype the paper, down in the parts of the article fewer people read.

7 posted on 10/25/2012 9:52:04 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"potentially" "could" "unclear"

I just love science! /s

8 posted on 10/25/2012 9:54:57 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

hmm, and the EPA is worried about cow farts?


9 posted on 10/25/2012 10:02:56 PM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
There’s something under the Outer Banks...and it’s farting.
11 posted on 10/25/2012 10:13:34 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

So, the sea floor is flatulating. Harvest it.


13 posted on 10/25/2012 10:30:00 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Hornbach and his co-author Benjamin Phrampus, also of the Southern Methodist University, have uncovered a powerful new way to use data from the geological record to catch non-anthropogenic climate changes that are already happening...

WHAT??!! You mean... the climate changes even if we don't drive our SUV's around? (/sarc)

One of the best lines I ever saw on FR went something like "'Normal' is Chicago under a mile of ice."

14 posted on 10/25/2012 10:53:01 PM PDT by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Mea culpa.

If only I had changed lightbulbs sooner, this would never have happened.

15 posted on 10/25/2012 10:57:46 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This article is a mess.


16 posted on 10/25/2012 11:17:55 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Obama didn't fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Puleeeeeez......I have a circa 1850 book that has a whole article on this methane/ocean occurence. It is nothing new.


17 posted on 10/26/2012 12:12:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The piece sounds like grant fishing to me. Screw around at sea, write about a hypothesis, use that for the basis of a grant application


23 posted on 10/27/2012 5:26:00 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If I recall correctly, far more methane is produced by microbes under the ocean than on land, the vast majority of all photosynthesis and respiration on Earth also occurs in the ocean as well. Last time I heard, there’s still plenty about our oceans and water-filled caverns left to be discovered.


27 posted on 10/29/2012 7:01:31 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson