Even Marist seems to be coming along.
Why does the WSJ associate with these leftwing polling outfits? Couldn’t they find anyone with a calculator?
Nevada isn’t looking good for us, imo. We have to win OH or WI.
I think CO and NH and probably IA as well go Romney.
The polls are scrambling to get in line with reality. They have skewed as much as they could, but, hey, they will still have to peddle their polls when Obama festers on the scrap heap of history.
If the GOP is tied with anything involving the MSNBC folks...
When you put in real actual voter turnout using a model of 2010 or 2004, Romney is going to make everyone at MSNBC start crying.
In 2008, early voting stats in NV had a D vs R ratio of 51.5% of 31.3%. This year, it’s been 47.3% to 35.9%. A 20.2% difference has shrunk to 11.4%. Obama won in 2008 by 12.5%. While NV is not out of Romney’s reach, it appears to be tilting Obama for 2012. Romney is counting on independent voters to provide his margin of victory.
2012 NV early voting stats:
http://nvsos.gov/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=2491
2008 NV early voting stats:
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/10/31/early-voting-suggests-nevada-victory-at-hand-for-obama/
I got news for MSNBC: It is not tied here in Colorado. Mitt is going to win, and comfortably