Here’s my $.02.
*State Dept was not paying attention to Benghazi....as the Ambassador was there to divert weapons to Syria.
*Video was CREATED and put on the back burner to be used later when needed. The vid actually had hardly ANY hits.
*Protests in Egypt erupted to free the Blind Sheik. If you notice....there were placards with his image that were used in the ‘peaceful’ protests there. Then they stormed the Embassy.....and brandished the Al-Q flag.
(There were rumors in the press that Obama was to release the Sheik....but he got outed. Beck was all over this.)
*Egyptian Embassy Twitter feed mentions a ‘video’.....and they are apologetic.
*Then.....State Department decides to USE the ‘concocted’ video to blame for the attack in Benghazi out of convenience.....when it had NOTHING to do with it at all.
Wrap up: The ‘video’ was ORIGINALLY supposed to be used to cause a stir to get the Blind Sheik released. NOT the cause of the Benghazi massacre.
If you look at the images from the Egypt protests there were westerners participating in that, and they were wearing those stupid white grinning Guy Fawkes [sp?] masks. Some of the photos, when reused in later reports, were cropped to remove the white guys. Maybe they were omitted because people might wonder why western anarchists would participate in a protest alleged to be about a video that insults the prophet?