Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoLibZone
To be fair, Obama didn't say we don't have horses and bayonettes anymore. He said we have less than in 1916.

I'm sure he's right about horses, bayonettes - I'm not so sure.

12 posted on 10/22/2012 11:52:34 PM PDT by dead (It ain't over until the phone lady sings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dead

Talk show guest today (105.9 FM, 630 AM Washington DC) described the large number of bayonets present in today’s Army.


13 posted on 10/23/2012 2:47:19 AM PDT by jimfree (In Nov 2012 my 12 y/o granddaughter has more relevant&quality executive experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: dead

To be fair the comment Romney made was the size of the Navy. Talking about the use of land based weapons such as horses and bayonets was a complete miscomparison.

Romney could have fired back and said that the Navy’s combat role has expanded since 1916 substainally to support ground operations, partly because it was covering for obsolete weapons systems such as “horses”.


14 posted on 10/23/2012 4:48:55 AM PDT by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson