[Tex-Con-Man]

The first picture is a link to a YouTube video which proves the girl in this DVD is NOT Stanley Ann Dunham...

This image of some other fine DVD's by Director Joel Glbert is a link to a website that contains an in-depth look into Gilbert and Dreams from My Real Father...including an interview with the man who actually owns the home Frank Marshall Davis lived in. All information is sourced and linked where possible.

There is very little truth in Gilbert's "documentary".

Freepers need to crank their skepticism up to 11. This junk is no more credible than "Loose Change".

[DiogenesLamp]

I do not know why i'm bothering to do this because I don't see false information being spread about Obama as something I should particularly worry about, but I have to inform you that pointing out that Gilbert did some kooky stuff is not very persuasive. The National Enquirer has always done kooky stuff, but then they scooped the world on Monika Lewinsky's blue dress. (If I remember correctly.)

Just because someone has done something kooky in their past does not establish that other work which they have done is also kooky. It is not a persuasive argument.

What *IS* a persuasive argument is proving that someone is intentionally and knowingly lying about information which if known, would renders their entire argument invalid.

The only thing which you and LorenC has presented which I find compelling is the claim that LorenC had found one of the Gilbert pictures (alleged to be Stanley Ann) in a 1958 magazine. If this is true, then it proves that the Gilbert pictures cannot possibly be Stanley Ann.

THAT is your strong trump card. You should play it first. THEN your attacks on the credibility of Gilbert will resonate because they will be reinforced by the proof that Gilbert intentionally and with malice aforethought, lied to his audience.