[Jeff Head]

God grant that we can get to the bottom of this and avenge the deaths and enact justice against all involved, wherever that may lead.

[Jeff Head]

FYI...as horrible as it may seam, this is something to think about.

[FReepaholic]

This is quite possible. I first heard this theory a week ago.

[Sophia777]

Once again the Obama administration giving the American people the not so subtle, good ole one finger salute.

[pollywog]

I pray so Jeff. This is a National disgrace !!

[Principled]

I agree. And don’t forget the pre-planned video to blame.

And don’t forget the unexpected presence of two SEALS that fought back. They weren’t supposed to be there. They “messed up” a likely pre-planned hostage situation that 0dumbo would solve.

maybe

[Travis McGee]

Occam's razor says never ascribe to clever conspiracy, what is more likely the result of sheer incompetence.

[satan]

If so none of the attackers, if identified, will be taken alive. Some know too much.

Or maybe the SEALS killed those who were supposed to get the Ambassador alive.

[wrench]

Do not forget, Fast and Furious was an attempt at gun control likely by executive order, and it went horribly wrong.

The October Surprise angle is very plausible with these manipulators controlling our government, complete with their lap-dog media.

[SC_Pete]

With the Chicago Mob, anything is possible.

[xkaydet65]

according to State the original gunfight was with State security, I think a total of five agents armed with handguns and M4s with body armor and helmets. One agent located Stevens and Smith in the "safe room" that became their grave while the others secured a vehicle to transport the group to the safe house. It was not until the attack on the safehouse IIRC that the former SEALs became involved. By this time Stevens and Smith were already gone. The firefight lasted six hours and as formidable as SEALs are it is doubtful that the two alone could have resisted that long.

Now whether this story is truthful is another issue. I for one want to hear from the security guys who State says were there. Without starting a witchunt I think Issa should subpoena them and the vids and radio comms. My own feeling is that if five guys are tasked with protecting Stevens and Stevens winds up dead then some or all of those five should be lying beside him, like Randy Shuggart and Gary Gordon

[IMR 4350]

With the new info on the weapons smuggling to Syria, more than likely Steven's was supposed to be taken hostage as a cover for Obama putting their man into the al Quaeda ranks in Syria.

[Noumenon]

Yes. The hidden story is that of this abomination of a regime arming al Quaeda. Fast and Furious, Middle Eastern edition.

That is beyond treasonous.

[Nervous Tick]

What you suggest is certainly possible, especially considering the chicago thugs with which Obama surrounds himself.

However, IMHO “never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity”.

Obama and his choom gang were (and are) single-mindedly focused on Obama’ re-election. Their entire world view and all of their behavior in the run-up to this tragedy were informed by that single, simple goal.

Embassy security was neglected out of pure sloppy management and focus on other things (the convention, the campaign).

Other than the fact that the islamofascists are ALWAYS predisposed to killing us, if there was anything that “set them off”, it wasn’t that retarded movie — it was parading bin Laden’s head on a pike around the ‘rat convention. But again, Obama and his genius advisors were focused on the election. The possibility of fallout from their spiking the bin Laden ball enver came up in their planning sessions.

Once the tragedy occurred, an explanation HAD to be found that let Obama and his administration off the hook. That’s really all that’s necessary to completely explain the ham-fisted coverup.

IMHO, those things, and not an October surprise conspiracy, are the “occam’s razor” explanation for what has occurred.

Just my 2c, and FRegards

[DManA]

The facts on the table are so bad for Obama you really don’t need to stretch the narrative.

[cblue55]

My hubby and I were talking this idea over last night and this scenario makes a lot of sense. I’ve a feeling there’s more sewage at the bottom of this rabbit hole than anyone can ever imagine. Praying for the mother of the murdered ambassador who still has been given no answers about her son’s death.

[vanilla swirl]

This is the most plausable scenario.

[Jaxter]

I hate to say it but this does seem like a possibility. I've been thinking more and more about this over the last week or so. Why was what little security there was outsourced to a Welsh company that nobody ever heard of and why were they armed with only batons and flashlights? Especially with (at least) 2 previous attacks. I hope that the truth comes out soon what ever it is and I hope our murdered citizens and their families get justice.

[reagandemocrat]

Two other things:

1) “Argo” was released simultaneously. (Film about rescuing American hostages in Iran 33 years ago).

2) Kennedy was questioned about the the Blind Sheik at a Congressional Hearing two weeks ago on Benghazzi. Setting up a Quid pro quo.

[xzins]

I think the theory needs to be rewritten with Stevens accidentally killed.

The part about jihadists getting mad and killing him doesn’t work. There’s no reason the plot couldn’t have gone on with little adjustment once they secured Stevens.

This might also explain why they already had that video in their hip pocket. It was to be the precipitating cause, and Obama’s grand diplomacy, Dempsey’s grand stand with pastor Jones, and the arrest of the video producer would have all been original parts of the plan.

Stevens came up dead, and they carried on with the plot, hoping some opportunity for some kind of negotiating would arise, but CNN screwed it all up with the release of the diary.

[Talisker]

All security-denial went through Hillary - she admitted it.

So why is this ignored?

Security-denial WAS the op!