Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux

“Get the transcript”

yep! I heard Obama say that too!

1st. Why would Candy have of that obscure speech sitting in front of her?

2nd. How did Obama KNOW Candy had it?

It’s obvious that Obama was told ahead of time what all the questions would be to “level the playing field” since he can’t have a teleprompter during the debate feeding him the answers.


2 posted on 10/19/2012 6:48:38 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasFreeper2009

Then, after the “get the transcript” order, he made her repeat it “louder”. He’s like an 8 year old saying, see I’ve got proof.

Only it wasn’t proof of anything except the fact that Crowley and Obama colluded on a Presidential debate.


16 posted on 10/19/2012 7:09:00 AM PDT by Kenny (<p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

CNN has apparently already admitted seeking to “level the playing field” in another way, by giving a time edge to the President since he didn’t get in as many words the last time - “he speaks slower.” At least the American people are finally waking up to the fact that there are is at least one job in which affirmative action should not put a less qualified candidate on top.

That being said, I honestly think Candy was more of a useful idiot than a direct conspirator. Prior to the debate the Whitehouse had made comments to the effect of the Rose Garden speech calling the incident an act of terror, probably reinforced to Candy by her cohorts in a manner to create plausible denial - she became aware of a potential line and she investigated, thus coming to the debate with a transcript of the speech (just wonder - have any other moderators ever brought such a document? I think not).


18 posted on 10/19/2012 7:13:05 AM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

“It’s obvious that Obama was told ahead of time what all the questions would be to “level the playing field” since he can’t have a teleprompter during the debate feeding him the answers.”

Actually I think Candy herself was the designated teleprompter.


19 posted on 10/19/2012 7:14:42 AM PDT by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Did Candy really have a copy of the transcript at the debate? How did Obama know Candy would come to his assisstance?


21 posted on 10/19/2012 7:21:06 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009
It’s obvious that Obama was told ahead of time what all the questions would be to “level the playing field” since he can’t have a teleprompter during the debate feeding him the answers.

Thirty minutes into the debate I knew that. When Romney was asked a question he would hesitate a couple of seconds as he collected his thoughts. Obama would launch straight into his answers. When Obama speaks off the cuff there are many pauses and "ahs" and "uhs" in his pattern of speech. This did not happen in the last debate. Obama can read a beautiful oratory and sound very grand and wise. In an unprepared speech or answer he is neither wise, grand or knowledgeable. When he said look it up in the transcript it shows ineptness as is exposed the sham. When he said this Crowley became visible upset, nervous and unsure of what to do or say.

Candy Crowley tried to throw the debate and committed an act of journalistic prostitution. However, Romney won the debate against Obama and against Crowley. What is my proof? The polls the next day went up for Romney and down for Obama. In reference to Crowley and journalistic prostitution, I extend my very sincere apologies to prostitutes

26 posted on 10/19/2012 7:33:33 AM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Did anybody see O’Reilly last night with the body language expert on? She stated that O’s body position for the question was very open and relaxed as he sat an listened to Romney. Then as O said “please proceed Govenor” his facial expression was one of someone who was taunting because they knew something that others didn’t. This was right before he called for the transcript from Crowley. That comfirmed for me what I thought as I had watched it originally.

Watch it again if you can and you will see it as well. Very hard to hide body language - O’s gave him away. This question should have scared the pants off him if he didn’t know it in advance but it didn’t thus the confident relaxed body language.


38 posted on 10/19/2012 9:12:12 AM PDT by MissH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson