Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary’s non mea culpa (Benghazi cables will exonerate Hillary)
Daily Caller ^ | 10-18-2012 | Edward Klein

Posted on 10/18/2012 11:00:56 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot

At the second presidential debate this week, Barack Obama finally appeared to man-up and acknowledge that, as president and commander in chief, he was responsible for the deaths of four Americans during the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.

After all, said the president, the secretary of state “works for me,” and as the top person in the administration’s chain of command, the buck stopped at him.

(snip)

After the Clinton legal team had a chance to review the State Department cable traffic between Benghazi and Washington, the experts came to the conclusion that the cables proved that Hillary had in fact given specific instructions to beef up security in Libya, and that if those orders had been carried out — which they weren’t — they could conceivably have avoided the tragedy.

Clearly, someone in the Obama administration dropped the ball — and the president was still insisting that it was not his fault.

In the end, then, Hillary decided to assume responsibility to show that she was acting more presidential than the president.

I am told by my sources that she firmly believes that when the State Department cable traffic is made public, either through leaks to the press or during formal House committee hearings, it will exonerate her and shift the blame for the entire mess onto the president.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazicables; benghazisecurity; hillarysfault; nothillarysfault; obamasfault
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
You go, girl. Keep this up. Force Obama to be the little 'man' that we all know he is.

Not that I don't have my suspicions about you and your Clinton legal team ......

1 posted on 10/18/2012 11:00:57 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Why is there ALWAYS a Clinton legal team?


2 posted on 10/18/2012 11:21:53 AM PDT by Jumpmaster (Defund the Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Bingo! Hillary collected a HUGE marker from Obama here. She can true-up “history” after the election.


3 posted on 10/18/2012 11:33:28 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Why not eliminate the middle man and have whoever feeds Obama his lines debate Romney directly?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Nope. I don’t believe it for a minute. Those cables would have been out by now because Obama could have said, “See! See! My Secretary of State was trying to increase security!”
A reporter needs to do a timeline on Obama and Hillary for those two days. I’m thinking they watched the events in Benghazi and then had a meeting to plan the coverup. It may have been a teleconference, but they had a meeting to coordinate the coverup.


4 posted on 10/18/2012 11:37:24 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Probably Donilon blocked it. He’s such an idiot.


5 posted on 10/18/2012 11:37:45 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

>>> National Security Advisor Tom Donilon .....
Tom Donilon, a Manager of Overseas Crises - NYTimes.com Sept 23, 2012
(http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/us/politics/tom-donilon-a-manager-of-overseas-crises.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0)

We really need to pay closer attention to Lybia attack and lies/cover up timeline

‘bloked’ it or he is the leaker?


6 posted on 10/18/2012 11:57:13 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

How in the world did I write Lybia?

Libya, Libya, Libya.....


7 posted on 10/18/2012 11:59:32 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Hillary might get an education on just how difficult it can be to get a story to the public if it in any way damages the One!


8 posted on 10/18/2012 12:14:09 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

I suspected such—Hillary is many things but she is not stupid—she would have covered her A$$ completely—she learned a few things from Bill. He only screwed up when he let his manhood do the thinking.


9 posted on 10/18/2012 12:15:20 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
How in the world did I write Lybia? Libya, Libya, Libya.....

Hillary's Libya problem is different from her Lybia problem. Or something like that.

10 posted on 10/18/2012 12:17:27 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

She’s trying to avoid the appearance of dumping it ALL on da black guy cuz I think she’s still thinking about running for something. That’s also why Bill doesn’t dump on Hussein —the black vote.


11 posted on 10/18/2012 12:19:11 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

The Buck stops with Hillary Clintoon...

UNLESS the buck actually stops with Zero and the Zeromiesters..
As Zero said during the debate HE is head-moron.. the buck stops with him..

So many morons it’s hard to keep up..


12 posted on 10/18/2012 12:22:31 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

So, Hillary ordered for security to be beefed up in Libya, and she has the cables to prove it. If this is true, then the question becomes who in the White House rescinded this order?

My understanding is the Director of National Intelligence offices in the west wing, and monitors these communications in real time.

This could be hugh, and series.


13 posted on 10/18/2012 12:36:56 PM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

>>> This could be hugh, and series.

This SHOULD be huge.

Yet. We have ‘million men march for Big Bird’ and nonstop “BinderGate” all pushed by ObamaCamp and talkingheads on the tv tubes.....


14 posted on 10/18/2012 12:52:05 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot; hoosiermama; penelopesire; STARWISE; MestaMachine; SE Mom; ...
(Donilon has been M.I.A.)

After the Clinton legal team had a chance to review the State Department cable traffic between Benghazi and Washington, the experts came to the conclusion that the cables proved that Hillary had in fact given specific instructions to beef up security in Libya, and that if those orders had been carried out — which they weren’t — they could conceivably have avoided the tragedy.

Clearly, someone in the Obama administration dropped the ball — and the president was still insisting that it was not his fault.

In the end, then, Hillary decided to assume responsibility to show that she was acting more presidential than the president.

I am told by my sources that she firmly believes that when the State Department cable traffic is made public, either through leaks to the press or during formal House committee hearings, it will exonerate her and shift the blame for the entire mess onto the president.

15 posted on 10/18/2012 12:54:58 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

CORRECTION:

Last paragraph should also be in italics.


16 posted on 10/18/2012 12:56:11 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot; Snuph

more recent thread, same article

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2946825/posts

snuph comment to his thread:

“The Clintons are out in force today!!! 3rd post on their actions to throw Zero under the bus today.”


17 posted on 10/18/2012 1:10:00 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Wonderful! :-)

Let’s get the information just in time for next week’s debate.


18 posted on 10/18/2012 1:19:14 PM PDT by diamond6 (Freerepublic.com and Hillbuzz.org are my go to sites for conservative news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

The poop’s about to hit the fan, and it’s going to go all over ZERO.


19 posted on 10/18/2012 1:24:05 PM PDT by diamond6 (Freerepublic.com and Hillbuzz.org are my go to sites for conservative news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
Those cables would have been out by now because Obama could have said, “See! See! My Secretary of State was trying to increase security!”

You're missing the point. Saying that she tried to increase security but that the White House turned it down, puts the mess on him and him alone. He wanted her to be the scapegoat, but that's not going to happen. He gets the blame now.

20 posted on 10/18/2012 1:28:53 PM PDT by diamond6 (Freerepublic.com and Hillbuzz.org are my go to sites for conservative news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson