[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

I have not looked at MSNBC on this, but I would guess they would defend Crowley, saying that Obama’s “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation...” on Sept. 12 must have referred to the Benghazi attack.

But then after that, O and his minions kept talking about the notorious anti-muslim video (and Crowley agreed with Romney on that).

Maybe when he said “No acts of terror...” O was trying to have it both ways, both “respectful of muslim sensibilities” by being vague about what he meant, and also able to say he called it an “act of terror.”

[SeekAndFind]

Here's Crowley's walkback. She says Romney was right “in the main, --- meaning on the facts, but he chose the wrong word. Pathetic.

You got it wrong, Crowley. You screwed up the debate. Own it.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” Maybe when he said “No acts of terror...” O was trying to have it both ways,”

Correct.

Just another piece of Obamafraud.