[DH]

If it were up to the gun grabbers the law would require the shooter (defender) to have been beaten severely and on the verge of dying before he could shoot an unarmed man.

Only then, could it be proven that his life was at stake and to shoot was finally “earned.”

[muawiyah]

how about this ~ the now dead husband was preparing to defend himself against an attempt to give him a possibly untreatable STD and needed take the offending member to a laboratory for close and detailed evaluation.

I'd say the Castle Doctrine extends to all the various rooms and cavities in the family home, wouldn't you?

[rmh47]

If it were up to the gun grabbers the law would require the shooter (defender) to have been beaten severely and on the verge of dying before he could shoot an unarmed man.

Even that may not be sufficient.

Two words: Trayvon Martin.