Indeed, this in no way “eliminates the need for embryonic stem cells”,
because that need is based on the absolute NEED for had-aborts to justify their past decisions by having “science” show that what they killed was not a human and was just a “clump of cells” that now can be useful for harvesting.
The abortion debate is not, and has not been for a long time, about access to future abortions, but about justifying past abortions.
Indeed, this in no way “eliminates the need for embryonic stem cells”,
because that need is based on the absolute NEED for had-aborts to justify their past decisions by having “science” show that what they killed was not a human and was just a “clump of cells” that now can be useful for harvesting.
The abortion debate is not, and has not been for a long time, about access to future abortions, but about justifying past abortions.
They were trying to justify Evil by claiming it was for the “Common Good”, this is how Evil always tries to justify itself.
I mean if you wanted stem cells for pure research, embryonic stem cells could be provided from miscarriges caused by trauma ie. ( car wrecks, accidental falls, etc...) that way some good could come from a tragedy, but no good comes from “Manufactured Tragedy”.
It would be like trying to justify the execution of old people because you would be using their organs... True some good would come out of saving lives, but the EVIL and INHUMANE act of killing the old people because they are old and you need their organs would never ever come close the equaling the amount of “good” that came of it.....