That last paragraph is the least believable in the whole story.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Some people think Big Bird is more important
To: 2ndDivisionVet
oh I believe the WH would release crap like that
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well,at least they got the “24 hours” part right.The knuckledraggers in Tehran sporting the white beards and the black dresses want to meet their “virgins” and Israel is willing to accommodate them...if given an excuse.
4 posted on
10/05/2012 6:17:18 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“We have expertise in fighting wars of attrition and Israel cannot fight a war of attrition.” Well,he's right there.Israel cannot fight a war of attrition.However,I wonder if they might have weapons that might allow Israel to win a quick war.My hunch is.....that they do.
5 posted on
10/05/2012 6:21:00 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The stupidity of Obama is overwhelming. Such a war would be a nuclear exchange. Forget about oil. The radioactive cloud would sweep northeast with the winds, resulting in tens of millions of deaths and hundreds of millions of sick. That would be the real disaster. Jews around the world would again have to regroup as we did after WW II. Iran would be gone, along with many of its neighbors.
6 posted on
10/05/2012 6:26:39 AM PDT by
pabianice
(washington, dc ..)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Israel is way ahead of you on reason, diaperheads.
8 posted on
10/05/2012 6:27:57 AM PDT by
crosshairs
(America: Once the land of the free. Still the home of the brave.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“We have expertise in fighting wars of attrition and Israel cannot fight a war of attrition.” You are exactly correct, Sir. It will not be a war of attrition. Instead, it will be a war of annihilation; a war that Israel is fully capable of executing.
10 posted on
10/05/2012 7:42:31 AM PDT by
Captain Rhino
(Determined Effort is the hammer that Human Will uses to forge Tomorrow on the anvil of Today.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“If such a war does happen, it would not be a long war, and it would benefit the entire Islamic umma [the global community of Muslims],” Shirazi said, according to the Post. “We have expertise in fighting wars of attrition and Israel cannot fight a war of attrition.” Is it supposed to give confidence to their people to promise that an armed conflict with Israel would not be a long war but then cite their experience in fighting wars of attrition as justification for that promise? Are not wars of attrition by definition long wars?
12 posted on
10/05/2012 9:39:24 AM PDT by
etcb
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Two words for the mullets in Iran to ponder:
Samson Option
15 posted on
10/05/2012 1:17:28 PM PDT by
astounded
(Barack Obama is a clear and present danger to the USA)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
18 posted on
10/07/2012 8:40:02 AM PDT by
SJackson
(none of this suggests there are hostile feelings for the US in Egypt, Victoria Nuland, State Dept)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson