Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I dunno. I still can’t get “explosion” from oily rags, gunpowder, primers, loaded rounds, etc. I could understand fire, but not explosion. Unless there was something in the room that I don’t normally keep.

TC


10 posted on 10/02/2012 1:04:01 PM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Pentagon Leatherneck; Blueflag
I could understand fire, but not explosion.

The key is the airtight room. We know it was airtight because the homeowner felt pressure when he tried to open the door.

The explosion is because the pressure kept building up until it reached the breaking point of the container (the airtight room).

This would not have happened in a room with normal ventilation.

12 posted on 10/02/2012 1:19:51 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck
I dunno. I still can’t get “explosion” from oily rags, gunpowder, primers, loaded rounds, etc. I could understand fire, but not explosion. Unless there was something in the room that I don’t normally keep.

Solvents evaporating, rags ignite, a small fire ensues. The door is opened, more oxygen is allowed into the room, a flash-over occurs. Not an explosion as such but close enough to a "low explosive" so as not to matter. A flash fire would also explain how the wife burned her face and hands.

Regards,
GtG

23 posted on 10/02/2012 3:36:32 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson