[Libloather]

She built that.

[redshawk]

Cross bar hotel.

[apillar]

She’s not an honest injun?

[ClearCase_guy]

There will be no consequences.

[hoosiermama]

Faux Indian, Faux Lawyer....Is there a pattern here?

[DTogo]

High cheek bones = law license, right Kimo-sabe?

[R_Kangel]

" ..... It was an honest mistake. There's no need to be hard on her .... give her a pass on this one."

If you haven't learned by now, the socialists are immune to prosecution in this once free country. The rule of thumb when understanding the current state of affairs in America is: They protect their own. We eat ours.

[Clintonfatigued]

Maybe this will finally cook Elizabeth Warren’s goose. It’ll take more than smoke singals and a rain dance for her to overcome this revelation.

[Cicero]

Sounds like just the sort of idiot the Massachusetts voters love to vote for.

Oh, for the good old days, when they used to vote for the Irish Mafia. Compared to their current rulers, the Irish Mafia were straightforwardly corrupt, ran a tight ship, and didn’t pretend to be anything they weren’t.

[tumblindice]

Democrats: the outlaw party

[Cookies4ever]

Un-Freaking-Believable! This horrid woman has no shame and apparently no limits. But will the brain dead dems elect her? It’s possible...sad but possible.

[garjog]

“Warren, however, never has been licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.”

Do we know for sure that this is true? My wife is an attorney and she says that every brief or legal document filed has to have your bar license number on it and if these didn't appear the other side would balk.

The only way she could practice law without a license in her state would be if she was associated with another attorney with the proper license.

I trust Front Page Mag, but just wondering if we have other sources to confirm this. It is totally outrageous if true.

[JohnBovenmyer]

The laws may be written by lawyers to protect lawyers, but I'd think it would also be written to protect their legal monopoly. A question for the Freeper legal eagles: if you lose a lawsuit and the winning side's 'lawyer wasn't licensed as one do you have grounds to overturn the verdict? Or is there any way to sue that fake lawyer,' (and perhaps their 'client' too if you can show they knew she was fake or should have known so) for damages? I very much doubt the 'official' enforcement agencies in deep blue Massachusetts will act against Warren. But if there are $ available there's bound to be a licensed shyster somewhere who could find a greedy plaintiff and take on a civil case even Orly Taitz could win. Even if the courts lied together to protect Warren the news of such a suit would kill her candidacy. Now Jacobsen admits he still has a questions to resolve regarding possible licensure in other states, but those should be resolved in a few days leaving plenty of time for filing civil suits if suitable legal grounds are present.

[CORedneck]

There needs to be a way to really embarrass this dumb broad in the same manner as what happened to that Churchill guy in Boulder, CO.

[SERKIT]

Lie-a-watha.

[sickoflibs]

Interesting!

[Venturer]

Democrats don’t care about these little dalliances with the law.

It won’t hurt her a bit.

[Ann Archy]

OMG!! If she were a REPUBLICAN this would be REALLY be FRONT PAGE NEWS!!

[lentulusgracchus]

Hey, back off our Princess Poke-a-Honkey, okay?

Her intentions were good!!