Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: matt1234

“The federal regulatory commission found the rules don’t allow for unilateral curtailment, and that any associated costs were taken into consideration when the long-term agreements were created.”

So now the Federal Government is helping to enforce Long Term Contracts that Idaho Power signed without taking into consideration possible long term market factors?

What is the world coming to when a party to a contact is not permitted to break the contract when market factors change?


5 posted on 09/23/2012 11:24:03 AM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Slayton

They force the power companies in WA State to buy wind energy, also, even though we have more than enough hydro-power to supply our energy needs. The reason is that the excess power all goes to California, where the voters don’t want any type of power plants in their own state.

I read a newspaper this summer, from San Luis Obispo, that ran article about the fact that the Marin County Sierra Club was refusing to endorse a long time supporter of the Sierra Club for re-election because he had supported the construction of a solar power plant in Marin County. Marin County has also scrapped plans for a de-salinization plant, saying that conservation is a better way to go.


6 posted on 09/23/2012 11:28:43 AM PDT by Eva (Obama and Hillary lied, Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson