[zencycler]

So now, with the graph and the corrected data, what I'm trying to accomplish is to show:

1) The percentage of Romney's welath that he keeps for himself (after paying out taxes and charity) truly is a "fair share", based on both common sense, and relative to what others pay and would expect a wealthy person to be able to retain.

2) The history of Obama's charitable giving pales in comparison to Romney, and Obama's history also shows him pumping up his charitable donations as he began to run for higher office.

3) Because of his low charitable giving, Obama has been retaining a greater percentage of his wealth for himself than Romney.

[zencycler]

Total $Kep = Total $Kept (the “t” seems to have been squeezed out in the graphic).