To: tanknetter
Depends on which weapon I am most proficient with. All things considered the hand gun would be the best choice. Less chance of a lot of collateral damage, less chance of spraying employee with buck shot. Store owner is to be commended for not aiming at center mass. But the state will have to feed and house this crumb for a while.
10 posted on
09/21/2012 11:53:33 AM PDT by
BooBoo1000
("The plans I have for you are plans to prosper you.,not to harm you, Plans to give you hope)
To: BooBoo1000
Article Sez.. “Perps still on the loose”
12 posted on
09/21/2012 11:54:56 AM PDT by
Cliff Dweller
(No such thing as a threat... just targets)
To: BooBoo1000
Store owner is to be commended for not aiming at center mass. I am dubious. Personally, I think it was just luck (the bad guy's) that he was hit in the shoulder. I highly doubt that in the heat of the moment, the store owner made a calculated decision to shoot him in the shoulder.
As far as making that decision, don't. It's too easy to miss; giving the bad guy a chance to shoot back, and it is a legal liability; the bad guy can sue you for maiming him. That's especially true if you announce to the world that you were trying to do it, like the store owner did.
16 posted on
09/21/2012 12:13:04 PM PDT by
Turbo Pig
(...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson