I have long predicted that eventually this country will elect the second coming of Hitler when he promises to start sending bankers to Leavenworth.
Well let’s see.
If Hitler was running against Mao, I’d vote for Hitler, I suppose.
If Mao was running against Alinsky, I’d vote for Alensky.
If Alensky were running against Marx, Marx maybe?
But I can assure you, I’d never vote for a third party candidate.
That would be wrong... </you-know-which-kind-of-bot mode>
All of the above are a solid Obama vote.
Stunning, isn't it. Even conservative journalists and talk-show hosts are squeamish to point out the obvious.
James Lewis article just posted today:
Obama and Religious War - Obama is Malcolm X brought to life - a leftist reactionary
Hitler. He actually made the trains run on time, built the autobahn and rebuilt the German nation. If he had stopped there he would have been remembered as a great man (of course he didn’t and there in lies the rub).
Marx. a freeloading philosopher: nope
Alinsky. A freeloading philosopher and community agitator: nope
Mao. A Communist dictator who destroyed his country by design and set it back probably 50 years in its development as a modern nation: nope
Based on what we have seen so far O’Bama is basically a mix of Marx, Alinsky and Mao. Give me somebody that actually accomplished something good for his people even if he ultimately showed his true colors and brought his country and half of Europe to ruin and opened it up to 40 years of communist rule.
The answer is I would shoot Saul Alinskey with all three bullets to make sure he was dead.
Why vote for any one of them when we have all 4 wrapped into one with Obama?
I’ll vote write in if they are the choice.
This time around the choice seems more like that between Mal and Gorbachev.
This time around the choice seems more like that between Mao and Gorbachev.
If THOSE guys are the top of the ticket???
...Then It’s CLOBBERIN’ TIME!!!