Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

So why does she have the letters she wrote to clinton? Didn’t she give them to him? He then gave these letters back to the bimbo? Doesn’t make sense.


7 posted on 09/19/2012 10:14:04 AM PDT by 109ACS (If this be Treason, then make the most of it. Patrick Henry, May 1765)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 109ACS
So why does she have the letters she wrote to clinton? Didn’t she give them to him? He then gave these letters back to the bimbo? Doesn’t make sense.

The implication is that she is still in possession of copies of the letters which she wrote to Clinton.

After all: Doesn't everyone makes copies of their own letters for their files?

Regards,

12 posted on 09/19/2012 10:18:44 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: 109ACS

It makes all kinds of sense.
If he kept them, Hillary would see them. He didn’t need to give her additional ammunition.
Chelsea might have seen them. I give both Clintons credit for caring enough to shield her.
An ‘aide’ might have stolen them for profit.
He didn’t want them, she was not at all special to him. This is the most likely. She was nothing but a temporary toy.


18 posted on 09/19/2012 10:21:54 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson