Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Songwriter

No we do not have the committment to defeat any enemy that uses asymetrical warfare against us. The reason for that is simple, when your enemy uses the cover of civilians to attack you, the only proven military response is to remove all civilian life from the area in question. Our culture has given that a naughty name called genocide and apparently we would prefer to have our own children suffer than be accused of it.

Right this very moment, if the people of this country united to demand the removal of unlawful foreign invaders on our own land we would be accused of genocide by the previous nominee of the GOP on CNN inside of 5 minutes!


45 posted on 09/18/2012 1:01:35 PM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: The Toll

I agree. So the ultimate answer, for now, if not changed, is unilateral surrender to these animals. But I would ask is it more charitable to give up your own children to be brutalized and turned muslim or to kill those who will kill our own offspring. If the rules are brutality, then we can bring more brutality now. That window will close in a few months or years, and by default we will have been defeated. That is unless reality is embraced and we take steps, brutal steps, to defeat these animals.


47 posted on 09/18/2012 1:10:56 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson