Makes the timing of the Libya attack and resultant blaming of a movie that much more suspicious.
Wouldn’t this “change in freedoms” require a constitutional amendment?
I’m not worried. The aclu will get out in front of this issue. /s
Well, if they decide to pursue this avenue, I certainly hope Obama’s DOJ goes after Sony’s new flick “Zero Dark Thirty,” along with the White Hut and Pentagon officials who provided the classified info to make this muslim-hating movie.
IS IT TRUE that the guy in California who made that movie, “The Innocence of Muslims” is a $1 million dollar contributor to Obama?? I’m just asking, if anyone knows - not accusing. It was posted earlier on FR, but don’t know the truth of it . . .
and it seems that the ONLY religion it is OK with this regime to criticize, lie about, and villify is CHRISTIANITY. Christians have been cast as “far rightwing extremists” by this regime, “dangerous” ones at that.
Not to play devils advocate, but the DOJ could never say wether something will stay legal/illegal or become legal/illegale- they only enforce the laws (and this administration not very well) and not set them, right? I have a feeling I’m missing something.