[Uri’el-2012]

This morning i caught Susan Rice,ambassador to the UN on TV. I guess a weekend talk show interview. All i heard her say was “we had no actionable intelligence” in regards to the attacks. Of course that leads me to believe we did have intelligence but it never reached the level of ‘actionable’. Not actionable i guess includes no bullets. The other thought that came to mind is why would our ambassador to the UN be in that intelligence loop? That makes absolutely no sense at all at least in my eyes. To me she was given a specific response to say on TV and did so.

They are playing the RACE card and the GENDER card.

Rice has nothing to do with the operation of Embassies and Consulates.

But please don't pick on the little black girl.

[wiggen]

I was incredulous that she was bringing this message as though she was a voice of authority.

[piasa]

“The London Telegraph’s weekend [April 2003]revelations raise deeply disturbing questions about the extent and magnitude to which President Clinton, his national-security adviser Samuel R. “Sandy” Berger, and senior terrorism and State Department officials — including Assistant Secretary of State for East Africa, Susan Rice — politicized intelligence data, relied on and even circulated fabricated evidence in making critical national-security decisions, and presided over a string of intelligence failures during the months leading up to the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.” ——Mansoor Ijaz