You are being unresponsive. What historical assertion? That marriage was religious first? Well, yeah, since religion, again, predates civil society. So what?
Yes, you do have a problem with civil contracts, like marriage, which you just argued shouldn’t be legal due to the law’s profanity.
As for the photographer, I assume that’s to do with some variety of “discrimination” law, and is neither here nor there.
>> Yes, you do have a problem with civil contracts, like marriage, which you just argued shouldn’t be legal due to the law’s profanity.
>> which you just argued shouldn’t be legal
Did I say it should be illegal?