[campaignPete R-CT]

With liberal Republicans running for the HOUSE in CT-4 and CT-5, McMahon looks like the best hope for conservatives to secure a victory in Connecticut. Social conservatives should support McMahon.

DEM Murphy is a sure fillibuster against any GOP SCOTUS nominee. I agree with NARAL, that McMahon is a threat to their agenda.

[DemforBush]

I’ve really been impressed with McMahon. She’s tough, smart, and understands business. I don’t know all of her positions, and suspect there would be some where I disagree with her. Still, she looks to be measurably better than the departing Joe Lieberman and surely will be far better than Murphy.

[Steely Tom]

All she has to say is “NARAL will never support me no matter what position I take on abortion.”

[Zeppo]

On the issue of a woman’s right to choose, McMahon has “intentionally left her position vague,” Miron said. The only times that she has talked about reproductive freedom, it has been to espouse “extremist anti-choice policies,” he said. NARAL has endorsed Murphy, a Congressman who represents the western part of the state. Miron said his press conference was not organized at the request of the Murphy campaign.

Let me see if I have this straight.

A Democrat/Commie wuss, um, I mean a Democrat/Commie man, is claiming that McMahon, the female Republican candidate, is part of the 'Republican war on women', but he has not coordinated his slapfest with the Murphy campaign.

Right, I believe that, sure, it makes perfect sense to me.

Wait, WUT?