In response to this rather astounding evidence, the legal world has replied with a resounding "So what?"
State AG's review their state codes and find no laws requiring candidates to present a Birth Certificate to prove qualification for office. Thus, State AGs MAY use a BC as part of their own due diligence, but are NOT REQUIRED to do so by statute. IOW, they are constitutionally empowered to do pretty much whatever the heck they wish to do to certify a candidate's eligibility to seek an office.
In essence, Obama's case is that he was duly elected, and the certification of that election is an ipso facto certification of his eligibility as a candidate. Apparently, the court agreed.
"...... If the law supposes that, then the law is a ass, a idiot!" Charles Dickens.
The law is Article II of the Constitution. Turning a blind eye to evidence that Obama does not fit constitutional requirements is not only a travesty, it is treasonous and contrary to the oath of office of any public servant who refusues to examine the facts, in order to execute their duties.