Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

I read a book (don’t remeber Title/Author) many years ago about the Carter Administration secretly working w/Big Tobacco to make a report on the assets & liabilities of legalisation.

The issue that stopped Carter from moving forward was that Law Enforcement had no accurate way of determining at a traffic stop if a driver was under the influence.

Technology has advanced so far since then, does anyone know if such a method exists today?


60 posted on 09/11/2012 1:25:43 PM PDT by delcopatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: delcopatriot

The problem with detecting pot use by test is that it stays in your system so much longer than it makes you high. You can tell via urine if somebody smoked pot in the last month, via hair sample for the entire time they’ve had that hair follicle, but are they high right now... That’s the “magic” from a law enforcement perspective of alcohol, when it’s in your blood it’s effecting you when it’s not it’s not, doesn’t have much in the way of non-buzz making traces.


69 posted on 09/11/2012 1:34:37 PM PDT by discostu (Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson