Thanks. Like I implied above, I’m suspicious of AP’s motive for writing the article.
He also says he’s proud of Romney care. Obama care is a rough approximation of Romney care.
BUT WAIT WAIT - That was a State plan not a Federal plan.
Well what do you think the second half of Repeal AND REPLACE means? Am I a traitor to the cause if I think the replacement might contain large chunks of what we know he is so proud of in his Mass plan?