If you look elsewhere, they were putting the number at $2 million, and that was about a month ago.
And if you look at what they spent the money on, it was advertising. They spent similar amounts on the other two candidates. All she could hit him for was being too conservative. I’ve read the rest of that article and the one they quote and found the argument weak. Since the same amount was spent on each of the three, does that mean she wanted them all to win? She hit each with one of the recent Democrat formulae they use here in Tennessee as well. None of the three tend to hurt candidates down here.
Show me where it says in that article that Akin took some or all or any money from the Democrats???
Show me where it says that most of his funding came from Dems???
Both your posts here are still lies unless you want to take them back:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2928062/posts?page=33#32
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2928062/posts?page=33#33