Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather
Probably not allowed by Bank of America, which cannot be seen to be endorsing one party over the other.
2 posted on 09/02/2012 4:17:44 AM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Loyalist
Probably not allowed by Bank of America, which cannot be seen to be endorsing one party over the other.

But an NFL team would endorse one party over the other? I'm not buying it.

3 posted on 09/02/2012 4:20:23 AM PDT by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

Bank of America probably paid dearly for naming rights to the stadium. I’m sure they have a contract that requires the team to use that name.

I would also think they would write it into each contract that every event call it by that name as well. The amount of exposure during a national convention is huge. Why would they give that up for no gain? I would require either proper naming for an event or a fee for temporary renaming of the stadium.


8 posted on 09/02/2012 4:46:06 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson