To: Libloather
Probably not allowed by Bank of America, which cannot be seen to be endorsing one party over the other.
2 posted on
09/02/2012 4:17:44 AM PDT by
Loyalist
To: Loyalist
Probably not allowed by Bank of America, which cannot be seen to be endorsing one party over the other.But an NFL team would endorse one party over the other? I'm not buying it.
3 posted on
09/02/2012 4:20:23 AM PDT by
Libloather
(The epitome of civility.)
To: Loyalist
Bank of America probably paid dearly for naming rights to the stadium. I’m sure they have a contract that requires the team to use that name.
I would also think they would write it into each contract that every event call it by that name as well. The amount of exposure during a national convention is huge. Why would they give that up for no gain? I would require either proper naming for an event or a fee for temporary renaming of the stadium.
8 posted on
09/02/2012 4:46:06 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson